10,000 Russian troops conduct massive nuclear exercise

map of Ukraine

In January 2014, Russia carried out a large surprise ad hoc military drill around the Crimean Black Sea. No one at the time thought anything of it. But, of course, we know now the drill was a prelude to Moscow’s annexation of Crimea.

Three days ago, on March 27, 2014, ten thousand Russian troops began a military drill simulating the massive deployment of nuclear missiles.

Zachary Keck reports for The Diplomat, March 29, 2014, that while much Western attention has been bestowed on Russia’s conventional military buildup along the borders of Ukraine, Moscow also began a massive nuclear offensive exercise on Thursday.

According to the Russian daily Nezavisimaya Gazeta, citing multiple senior Russian military officers, Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces (SMF) began a massive three-day exercise involving 10,000 soldiers and 1,000 pieces of equipment from more than 30 units. The major purpose of the drill, according to the report, is to ensure the SMF have sufficient readiness to conduct offensive operations involving the massive and simultaneous use of nuclear missiles.

Global Security Newswire previously carried a story on the nuclear exercise, also citing the Nezavisimaya Gazeta article. GSN described the exercise as “practice for a large-scale nuclear offensive” and that “Exercise participants were set to position and prepare missile-firing units for launch, and to practice various administrative and support functions for the operation.”

As Russia’s conventional military capabilities have deteriorated following the collapse of the Soviet Union, Moscow has become increasingly reliant on operationalizing its nuclear arsenal. This has been reflected in successive Russian security documents. For example, Russia’s 1997 national security concept stated that Russia would use its nuclear arsenal “in case of a threat to the existence of the Russian Federation,” whether that threat came in the form of nuclear weapons or from a conventionally superior military power.

This threshold was further lowered in Russia’s 2000 military doctrine, which was the first released during Vladimir Putin’s presidency. This document said that Russia would use nuclear weapons “in response to large-scale aggression utilizing conventional weapons in situations critical to the national security of the Russian Federation.” This held out the possibility that Russia would use nuclear weapons even if Russia proper hadn’t been attacked. The same doctrine further noted that Russia reserved the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of any kind of weapons of mass destruction against it.

____________

Note: On March 25, 2014, two days before the commencement of Russia’s massive 3-day nuclear exercise, Russian television broadcast a tape of Yulia Tymoshenko urging that Ukraine’s 8 million ethnic Russians be “nuked.” 

Yulia Tymoshenko

Yulia Tymoshenko

Tymoshenko is Ukraine’s former prime minister and leader of the 2004 pro-democracy Orange revolution, who is widely seen as the most charismatic figure in the fractured Ukrainian opposition movement. 

In a conversation with Ukrainian MP and former government official Nestor Shufrych, Tymoshenko said, “One has to take up arms and go wipe out these damn ‘katsaps’ together with their leader.” (The word “katsap” is a derogatory Ukrainian term for Russians.) “I am sorry that I am not able to be there and am not in charge of these processes, they wouldn’t have had a fucking chance of getting Crimea off me. I would have found a way to finish off these bastards. I am hoping that I will use all my connections and will get the whole world to rise up so that not even scorched earth would be left of Russia.” Discussing the fate of Ukraine’s eight million ethnic Russians with Shufrych, Tymoshenko was heard as saying that they should be “nuked”.

____________

Shortly before reassuming the Russian presidency for a third term, Putin reaffirmed the importance he placed on Russia’s nuclear forces in a number of articles and speeches. For example, in an op-ed article in Foreign Policy magazine, Putin wrote: “We will, under no circumstances, surrender our strategic deterrent capability. Indeed, we will strengthen it.”

Thus, this week’s massive offensive nuclear drill is in line with the goals that Russia and Putin have been articulating for well over a decade. It is also consistent with Putin’s recent emphasis on conducting more frequent and sophisticated military drills to improve the combat readiness of Russian military forces. Indeed, Russia conducted a much smaller surprise nuclear drill in October of last year.

Still, the timing of the drill is likely to cause great concern in Western capitals, particularly in Washington. The drill could very well be intended to signal Russia’s resolve over events in Ukraine where Russia has been at loggerheads with the West and the government in Kiev over Moscow’s annexation of Crimea. A very visible reminder of Russia’s substantial nuclear capabilities would make sense for Moscow in a number of different contingencies, including if Russia is intending to move forces deeper into eastern Ukraine, as many currently fear.

For what it’s worth, the Nezavisimaya Gazeta article said there was no connection between the current nuclear exercise and the crisis in Ukraine. As evidence of this, it pointed out that in December of last year the commander of Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces had said that his forces would conduct a large and complicated exercise sometime during 2014.

From this, the Russian daily concluded that the drill had been planned for weeks and was completely unrelated to the tensions of Ukraine. At the same time, it ended the article by noting that testing the readiness of Russia’s strategic forces was especially important in light of the “current reality of the world situation.”

~StMA

 

Advertisements

6 responses to “10,000 Russian troops conduct massive nuclear exercise

  1. Reblogged this on Fellowship of the Minds and commented:
    This is ominous, especially in view of Putin’s military doctrine that states Russia would use nuclear weapons “in response to large-scale aggression utilizing conventional weapons in situations critical to the national security of the Russian Federation,” that is, even if Russia proper hadn’t been attacked.

    Like

  2. Reblogged this on Brittius.com and commented:
    Of the multitude of issues involving Ukraine, is the fact, that Obama is the one who destabilized that country (like he did in Libya, and Egypt), and now, Putin, is on a tear. Between Putin and Obama, I would trust Putin before I ever trust Obama. That’s my 2 cents worth.

    Like

  3. anchorageknight

    I do not see the slightest sense in which events in Ukraine are the fault of Obama. The fall of the oligarch was going to happen, regardless. Putin’s calculation, aided and abetted by a former German Chancelor employed as an advisor on Western options, was going to be he could proceed, whatever Obama said or did.

    This nuclear exercise is intended to intimidate EU from considering military operations of any kind. Not just related to Ukraine, also in defense of any other country or territory Putin is after. The most likely next dominos will be in Eastern – and also Western – Ukraine and Moldava. However, there are some indications parts of the Baltic states may follow soon afterward. That is much more serious – since they are formally members of EU and NATO. It is a trial baloon – to measure how much Western leaders can be intimidated into NOT insisting Russia respect international borders?

    Russia is relatively weak. It is actually dieing in several senses. The article correctly says this is WHY the increased focus on nuclear forces. This shift has gone on for more than 20 years. Nevertheless, Russian strategic thinking is very sophisticated. The summary view is that using nuclear weapons is insane – and that anyone who does needs to be stopped. The only time in history the Russian General Staff recommended their use – vs Europe – 400 – supported by 800 chemical weapons strikes (the General staff misinterpreted a NATO exercise as a decapitation attack) – it didn’t happen. Russia may be more stable than one might at suspect reading just this one item..

    Like

  4. Pingback: 10,000 Russian troops conduct massive nuclear exercise |

  5. Thank you StMA for this important post. This is indeed a dire situation. We must pray for peace- all of us, on a daily basis.

    Like

  6. A. James Gregor, Ph.D. & Professor

    It has become commonplace to compare the Russian/Ukraine tensions with those of National Socialist Germany/Poland in 1938-39. In many ways the circumstances are similar. After Germany’s epic defeat in 1918, there were ethnic Germans caught up in the land transfer to the newly reorganized Poland. And then there was the problem of the “Polish corridor” that gave the Poles access to the sea, but cut Germany off from East Prussia.

    Putin’s arguments for a rearrangement of borders follows the same logic pursued by Germany at the time of the crisis:
    (1) Germany wished to restore its citizens to the security of the “Homeland”–and
    (2) Germany needed a secure land connection with East Prussia for its security in increasingly insecure circumstances.

    It appears that Russia is preparing to address the same sort of concerns. Like Hitler, Putin may see threats where none may exist. No matter, they figure as threats in Russia’s calculations. For security purposes, Moscow wants a land corridor to the Crimean peninsula where there is a major Russian naval base critical to the defense of the Russian heartland. Drilling their nuclear forces in the region acts as a disincentive for any power to intervene in any Russian move to create such a land corridor from Russian territory directly to the Crimean peninsula. This need not involve an invasion — given Ukraine’s very weak hand. It could involve a bilateral treaty arrangement that assured Russian transports secure transit via selected Ukrainian roads in Eastern Ukraine. That would have the added advantages of providing Russian forces a permanent presence in the region where most ethnic Russians are found. The presence of Russian troops would assure “protection” for ethnic Russians in the general area.

    Under prevailing circumstances, Washington would most likely welcome such a “peaceful” resolution (since it has no other realistic option). Unlike Hitler, Putin has nuclear weapons. Moscow is holding all the cards.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s