State Department has no problems with Russia building spy “monitor stations” on U.S. soil

Glonass monitor station in BrazilA Russian “monitor station” in Brazil

Michael S. Schmidt and Eric Schmidt report for the New York Times, Nov. 16, 2013:

In recent months, the Central Intelligence Agency and the Pentagon have been quietly waging a campaign to stop the State Department from allowing Roscosmos, the Russian space agency, to build about half a dozen of these structures, known as monitor stations, on United States soil, several American officials said.

They fear that these structures could help Russia spy on the United States and improve the precision of Russian weaponry, the officials said. These monitor stations, the Russians contend, would significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of Moscow’s version of the Global Positioning System, the American satellite network that steers guided missiles to their targets and thirsty smartphone users to the nearest Starbucks.

“They don’t want to be reliant on the American system and believe that their systems, like GPS, will spawn other industries and applications,” said a former senior official in the State Department’s Office of Space and Advanced Technology. “They feel as though they are losing a technological edge to us in an important market. Look at everything GPS has done on things like your phone and the movement of planes and ships.”

The Russian effort is part of a larger global race by several countries — including China and European Union nations — to perfect their own global positioning systems and challenge the dominance of the American GPS.

For the State Department, permitting Russia to build the stations would help mend the Obama administration’s relationship with the government of President Vladimir V. Putin, now at a nadir because of Moscow’s granting asylum to Mr. Snowden and its backing of President Bashar al-Assad of Syria.

But the C.I.A. and other American spy agencies, as well as the Pentagon, suspect that the monitor stations would give the Russians a foothold on American territory that would sharpen the accuracy of Moscow’s satellite-steered weapons. The stations, they believe, could also give the Russians an opening to snoop on the United States within its borders.

The squabble is serious enough that administration officials have delayed a final decision until the Russians provide more information and until the American agencies sort out their differences, State Department and White House officials said.

Russia’s efforts have also stirred concerns on Capitol Hill, where members of the intelligence and armed services committees view Moscow’s global positioning network — known as Glonass, for Global Navigation Satellite System — with deep suspicion and are demanding answers from the administration.

“I would like to understand why the United States would be interested in enabling a GPS competitor, like Russian Glonass, when the world’s reliance on GPS is a clear advantage to the United States on multiple levels,” said Representative Mike D. Rogers, Republican of Alabama, the chairman of a House Armed Services subcommittee.

Mr. Rogers last week asked the Pentagon to provide an assessment of the proposal’s impact on national security. The request was made in a letter sent to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, Secretary of State John Kerry and the director of national intelligence, James R. Clapper Jr.

The monitor stations have been a high priority of Mr. Putin for several years as a means to improve Glonass not only to benefit the Russian military and civilian sectors but also to compete globally with GPS.

Earlier this year, Russia positioned a station in Brazil, and agreements with Spain, Indonesia and Australia are expected soon, according to Russian news reports. The United States has stations around the world, but none in Russia.

[Now, why is that? Inquiring minds want to know!]

Read the rest of the article here.

13 responses to “State Department has no problems with Russia building spy “monitor stations” on U.S. soil

  1. This seems very odd from the get-go. Why is there any interest at all in ‘helping’ Russia if there’s even a slight chance of espionage. Of course the NSA can say their systems are superior and can know if this happens, but isn’t that closing the barn door after the horse is gone?


  2. How difficult would one be to take out? Will they station Russian security forces here?


    • Taking it out is no problem. One anti-tank missile or two guys with axes can do it. The problem is what information the station is gathering frfom US electronic transmissions and whether the stattion is capable of jamming. As for “security forces” – nothing substantial. Probably a few local rent-a-cops to discourage metalr thieves and protest groups. The Russians would, in most cases, buy/build a small building or rent the top floor of a tall building and install the antenna on the roof. We’re talking about a permanent staff of 5-10 people at most.


  3. I see no possible advantage to the USA for allowing such stations to operate and many possible potentials for abuse. Russia is NOT our friend, certainly not as long as Tsar Putin is in charge. HELL, NO.


  4. “The United States has stations around the world, but none in Russia.”
    Seems to me that line sums it up.


  5. Time to have a RUSSIA heading on this site


  6. Once again, the people who are supposed to protect us have sold us out. Who knows how many senators’ kids got their Harvard education paid for because Senator Daddy took a bribe to look the other way.


  7. Sure, let them put them out in the boonies…away from everything….


  8. Could it be part of a deal to have Snowden returned to US? POTUS probably works more in favor of State Department then CIA or DOD.


  9. Thank youfor this amazing post. Nothing makes sense here, other than the fact that the current king of our country has his own agenda. . .odd, very odd and illogical.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s